Monday, November 16, 2009

So Evil, and yet so Innocent

Well, it's another Monday. In order to stay positive, I will now discuss something that incredibly positive. Girl Scout Cookies!

Now is that time of year. Little girls are out on Ho Plaza, selling their cookies to college students while students quarter-card and yell "Come to The Hangovers Fall Tonic XXX!" Needless to say, I expect that some of those little girls had part of their innocence taken away when they asked "what's a hangover?"

So here all of these adorable scouts are, selling boxes upon boxes of delicious cookies. How can you say no? Well, for me, it's easy. I live by this simple haiku:

If they can't pronounce
The ingredients in their
Products, don't buy them.


Seriously, have you looked at the packaging on the boxes? I doubt any health-concerned parent or scoutmaster would let these children eat the cookies. So why exactly are they allowed to sell them?

Here are the first four ingredients in "Samoas," one of the most popular cookie varieties:

Sugar, vegetable oil (palm, partially hydrogenated palm kernel, soybean and/or cottonseed with TBHQ to preserve freshness), enriched flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamin mononitrate [vitamin B1], riboflavin [vitamin B2], folic acid), corn syrup

A rather long list, for just four ingredients, if I'm not mistaken. Especially considering that half of those ingredients are sugar, and the sugar content is greater than the flour, which is generally considered to be the backbone of any pastry. Also, notice the fact that the second ingredient is "partially hydrogenated," meaning that it contains trans fat- an ingredient linked to cancer, coronary heart disease, infertility, diabetes, Alzheimer's, liver dysfunction, and many many other fun-filled diseases. And yet they market the cookies as being "trans fat free!" I think they may have forgotten the comma that makes it "trans fat, free!" which would still be false advertising, because they are not, in fact, free.

How is that then? Well it's simple- they reduced the size of cookies and the serving size so as to bring the amount of trans fat per serving under 0.5 grams, and therefore are not required to list it on the boxes.

At the same time, there is plenty of other fat and sugar to be worried about. Oh, and preservatives. And all of the greed and corrupt thought that goes into them, but they don't advertise that.

So here's my question for the Girl Scout organization: Why do you let innocent little girls sell such devilish food? Because it makes money? Because it's a longstanding tradition that's been around since 1917 (and I'm sure they had all of these ingredients in it back then)?

Well let me just say: These girls would be better employed selling "natural" or "organic" cookies for more money, or even quarter-carding for The Hangovers. How could someone ever resist coming to a great acappella concert when it's advertised by a little girl? And one that is unlikely to have any adverse effects on their health, at that.

4 comments:

  1. You are cynical.
    And not as deliciously filled with chocolatey minty goodness as Girl Scout cookies.
    They win.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Agreed. For someone so maniacally obsessed with preservative-laden Reese's, how dare you hate on the mighty Tagalong.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Except that Reece's aren't sold by little kids. And they don't falsely advertise being trans-fat free.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ingredients in a Reese's:

    Milk chocolate (sugar, cocoa butter, chocolate, nonfat milk, milk fat, corn syrup solids, soy lecithin, TBHQ), peanuts, sugar, dextrose, cocoa butter, chcoolate, nonfat milk, milk fat & contains 2% or less of partially hydrogenated vegetable oil (plam kernel and palm oil), salt, wheat flour, cornstarch, vegetable oil (cocoa butter, palm, palm kernel, shea, sunflower and/or safflower oil), whey, TBHQ, soy lecithin, leavening (sodium bicarbonate & sodium aluminium phosphate), vanillin.

    So it has TBHQ and hydrogenated oils. Sounds healthy. (TBHQ is tert-Butylhydroquinone, which I don't know about you, but I had trouble pronouncing the first time).

    ReplyDelete